Aging is a natural process for our skin, leaving us with wrinkles, fine lines, and a saggy skin appearance. Furthermore, not all individuals are ready to lie under a knife to restore their previous youthful and glowing skin appearance. Fortunately, the current beauty industry offers a diversity of non-surgical anti-aging procedures, where plasma fibroblast and Botox remain the most popular solutions. So, how to choose the most efficient option? Is fibroblast better than Botox? Let’s discover this in the article.
Fibroblast plasma therapy at the glance
Fibroblast plasma treatment appears as a revolutionary aesthetic approach to promote skin tightening effects in many body areas, including the face, neck, buttocks, and stomach. A painless procedure incorporates using a little electric charge transmitted through a pen-like device. The tip of an appliance does not penetrate or touch the skin layer, but it causes micro-injuries to the top dermal skin layer. It is needed to stimulate fibroblast cells in charge of collagen and elastin production. It takes around three to four weeks to see the full results that last up to three years.
What is Botox?
The chemical Botox is derived from the neurotoxin, which is known to provoke botulism in people. This substance aims to paralyze or freeze specific facial muscles to slow the process of skin wrinkles becoming more severe. However, Botox can not eliminate pre-existing wrinkles. Additionally, Botox injections are associated with no pain, with the full results coming as soon as a week following treatment. The anti-aging skin effects tend to last between two and three months. If you want to know how long after fibroblast can I have Botox, wait at least 40 days after fibroblast to inject Botox as a scarring treatment.
Plasma fibroblast vs. Botox
A concern around fibroblast vs. Botox is pretty widespread these days, as both aesthetic solutions work well to restore previous skin vitality in most patients. On the other hand, results after fibroblast are more long-lasting than Botox injecting – 2-3 years vs. 2-3 months. Therefore, people will spend less money on fibroblast plasma sessions. For instance, Botox for a forehead area will cost you anywhere between $200 and $500 every three months, while fibroblast specialists will charge around $700 with a single or two required touch-up treatments.
Another vital thing about Botox vs. fibroblast is the potential side effects and reactions. Taking a Botox injection, a patient might experience muscle spasms, substance migration to other areas, neck pain, dry mouth, and drooping eyelids, even though such adverse reactions are occasional. Fibroblast plasma therapy isn’t associated with such effects; however, skin redness and swelling are common in both aesthetic solutions.
If a patient seeks an alternative to Botox, fibroblast plasma treatment is the way to go. It doesn’t require any needles to perform a procedure, and it is associated with minimal risks and more lasting results. Unlike Botox and other facial fillers, fibroblast’s brand-new aesthetic approach won’t affect or change facial expression. Moreover, it is a less expensive skin tightening treatment than dermal fillers in most clinics.